On 11/16/2010 5:19 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> Would your conclusion be that the patch seems to increase the throughput
> of the aesni(4) ?
>
> I think that on small-sized blocks, when using aesni(4), the dominating
> factor is the copying/copyout of the data to/from the kernel address
> space. Still would be interesting to compare the full output
> of "openssl speed" on aesni(4) with and without the patch I posted.
Hi,
There does seem to be some improvement on large blocks. But there are
some freakishly fast times. On other sizes, there is no difference in
speed it would seem
I did 20 runs. Updated stats at http://www.tancsa.com/fpu.html
---Mike
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
