On 11/17/2010 11:35 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > Meantime, the similar change may be beneficial for padlock(4) too. > f you are going to test it, please note that most likely, openssl padlock > engine does not use padlock(4), I do not know for sure. > > diff --git a/sys/crypto/via/padlock.c b/sys/crypto/via/padlock.c > index 77e059b..ba63093 100644 > --- a/sys/crypto/via/padlock.c > +++ b/sys/crypto/via/padlock.c
Patch applied cleanly Full results at the bottom of http://www.tancsa.com/fpu.html On large blocks, version 1 vs the above patch show no significant difference. This is with openssl using the cryptodev engine. I also compared to the openssl padlock engine which gave interesting results! 0(via)# cat version1.txt | sed -e 's/k//g' | awk '{print $6}' > 1 0(via)# cat version2.txt | sed -e 's/k//g' | awk '{print $6}' > 2 0(via)# ministat 1 2 x 1 + 2 N Min Max Median Avg Stddev x 30 2591851.6 6645345.1 4326340.6 4227917.6 1083181.2 + 30 2574883.9 8830282.8 4033610.4 4241195.6 1519334.8 No difference proven at 95.0% confidence 0(via)# cat version1.txt | sed -e 's/k//g' | awk '{print $5}' > 1 0(via)# cat version2.txt | sed -e 's/k//g' | awk '{print $5}' > 2 0(via)# ministat 1 2 N Min Max Median Avg Stddev x 30 1124673.3 2320883.7 1527677.1 1550631.9 295165.4 + 30 1069788.2 2508865.7 1594506.2 1588193.2 389414.33 No difference proven at 95.0% confidence 0(via)# _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
