Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 22/03/2012 17:33 Volodymyr Kostyrko said the following:
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 22/03/2012 15:19 Mike Tkachuk said the following:
kern.eventtimer.periodic: 0
It might make sense to try 1 here.
Also you could attempt to involve mav@ directly - here is an author of the code
and an expert on it.
Better ask before setting as this doubles hpet0 (with HPET) or cpu0:timer (with
LAPIC) interrupt rate for me.
Does it make your system unusable?
Are you comparing with pre-eventtimers version of FreeBSD?
In short term - no. Haven't tested it thoroughly. Results are the same
(double interrupt rate according to `systat 1 -v`) for:
* i386 and amd64 9-STABLE;
* amd64 9.0.
As everything related to timing/freq/acpi can be unpredictive I wouldn't
recommend this to anyone. I own at least two Intel CPU's failing
somewhere near timing/apic when loading cpufreq and enabling powerd.
--
Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
