On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 02:20:37 +0100
"Michael Ross" <g...@ross.cx> wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:15:35 +0100, John Mehr
<j...@visi.com> wrote:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:16:53 -0400
Patrick McEvoy <patmce...@mac.com> wrote:
Hello John,
This is Patrick the BSDTV guy. If you have the time /
inclination, would you like to do a quick walk through
svnup?**If you have a machine that will run Skype, I
could record you doing a walk through including all the
things you want to tell users about your port. Skype
offers a "share your screen" feature that I have found
helpful for making such videos. If you are interested,
please let me know.
Thank you for your support of the BSD community.
**
-- Patrick McEvoy
patmce...@mac.com
cell: 718 440-5104
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hello,
I'm currently in the process of adding http/https
support to svnup and once I've got that working, the
command line interface will be changing to be more like
the traditional svn client to make it easier for people
to adopt the tool [...]
What'd you think about a syntax extension along the
lines of
svnup --bsd-base
svnup --bsd-ports
svnup --bsd-all
with automagic host selection, default to uname's major
version stable branch and default target dirs?
Hello,
This sounds good to me, and as long as there's some sort
of a consensus that we're not breaking the principle of
least surprise, I'm all for it. The one default that may
be unexpected is the defaulting to the stable branch --
people who track the security branches will be left out.
So maybe something like:
svnup --ports
svnup --stable
svnup --security (or --release)
Thoughts?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
