El 28/8/2016 14:56, "Dimitry Andric" <d...@freebsd.org> escribió: > > On 28 Aug 2016, at 02:10, K. Macy <km...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > >> The problem here is that Phoronix took a Beta version of FreeBSD 11. > >> Beta versions have a lot of debugging (malloc, invariants, witness) > >> options enabled which make it significantly slower than release > >> versions. This is even obviously when you run a Beta as a desktop. It > >> just feels much slower. > > > > > > I don't know what was going on in these particular tests, but in a > > more recent benchmarking run > > - https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=freebsd11-clang-gcc&num=1 > > - you're seeing the result of openmp being disabled in base. The clang > > maintainer for src refuses to include libomp as required for -fopenmp > > because nothing in base requires it. > > Come on, this is nonsense. I have indicated earlier that I would have > liked to import openmp into base, but this was shot down precisely for > that reason: nothing in base uses it. > > So for now, the solution is simply: install one of the llvm ports, and > use it. These have configuration setting to install every optional > component from the LLVM project. > > -Dimitry >
How does the port infrastructure handle openmp-enabled ports (those with an openmp option) then? Is an omp-capable compiler automatically pulled in or is openmp ignored unless the port explicitely requests one from ports? Fernando _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
