On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 08:49:15PM +0100, Christian Brueffer wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 02:31:00PM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 12:18:57AM +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > > > I was thinking about gvinum for the storage server, but given the > > > current documentation and the discussions about it now, I don't want to > > > risk it. > > > > IMHO it's pretty stable in 6.0. I've been running gvinum RAID-5 for a > > while now; other than one strange panic (something to do with out of > > memory situations, see kern/89660) I haven't had a hitch yet. That > > said, I haven't needed to replace a disk yet either (I've demoed this > > but it was not yet needed in production use). > > > > In short, don't write gvinum off just yet. Documentation is around the > > corner (as a result of a SoC project). > > Actually gvinum(8) has been committed to CURRENT and RELENG_6 a couple > of days ago.
Ah, I missed that, great :-) --Stijn -- Help Wanted: Telepath. You know where to apply.
pgpjxs5Of2tKy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
