Alexey Karagodov wrote: > hi. > i think, this unstablity happaning just because developers trying to make > two systems at one time, one is 6.0 and another 7.0 current and they > supporting old version, lower then 6.0 > i want to ask developers, why you developing new system, 7.0, if you don't > finish old, 6.0 ?! > finish 6.0, make it work, and upgrade it to 7.0 and to 8.0 and to 9.0 and so > on ... > what so new and revolutionary in 7.0 in comparison with 6.0 ?! > to use your system i must be a DEVELOPER, but i don't have so much time! i > don't want to develope! i want to use, i want to help you with some advise ( > e.g. what feature to add, what feature to change etc), i can and i want to > share some of my hardware to feet your needs, make a mirror, make a test > server/workstation/notebook/PDA etc. i'm not an freebsd developer. i'm just > admin and a user. > your system is most greatest i ever seen. another wonderful system is > SOLARIS. > but your's is so unstable ...
All this is described in many places. It all comes down to this: if you don't want to be a developer, JUST USE THE RELEASE BRANCH. That means Releng_6_0 for now. Stable only means compatible to previous versions of the same branch. Not that the system is stable. _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"