On Jun 20, 2007, at 1:22 PM, Daniel Bond wrote:
I like Kurt's approach
Well the goal is to allow either approach to work. Kurt is arguing
against this patch because it doesn't work for him...
having a mailfilter/script-pipe which could
remove dynamic variables like timestamps etc, and checksum it against
against a "empty" template to see if its deletable.
This also verifies that mail-delivery is working, and machine is
not dead.
But thats where the logic fails. Show me a mailfilter that will
observe the lack of a message?
Nobody who is against this patch is making logical arguments...
Yes, I agree in theory. If you have scripts that output a lot of
data every time and you need to look for anomolies, then a mailfilter/
pipe approach makes a lot of sense. But that doesn't mean that this
patch is a bad idea.
--
Jo Rhett
senior geek
Silicon Valley Colocation
Support Phone: 408-400-0550
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
