On 2007-Jul-28 19:03:54 -0300, JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >so using ULE in 7 is ok ? ? ?
Yes. >ULE in 6.x is absolutely ok and it runs depending on situation faster than >4BSD with correct kernel and sysctl settings for it and it is perfectly >stable, This is simply wrong. ULE in 6.x is known to have problems and is unsupported. If the problems do not affect your particular workload then fine. If you have _any_ problems whilst running with ULE in 6.x, your problems will not be invstigated unless you can reproduce the problem with the 4BSD scheduler. As Kris stated, reporting problems in 6.x when you are running ULE is just wasting developer resources. Please stop implying that people should be using ULE in 6.x unless you are willing to personally provide support for them. -- Peter Jeremy
pgpnFB7jwXUpV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
