On Jun 5, 2008, at 6:09 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
If you have issues with 6.3, your time would be better spent reporting
them (by which I mean describe them in detail) than waving your
hands in
the air and yelling at people.
Must you resort to nonsense and hyperbole?
I'd said nearly a dozen times that the issues I have aren't
specifics. I am questioning the overall policy for EoL here. Even if
it was known to work properly on my hardware the overwhelming amount
of bugs in 6.3 indicates an unstable release. The diffs between 6.3
and 6-STABLE are greater than the diffs between 6.2 and 6.3 last time
I checked.
I can't understand the logic in having only a single supported version
of the OS, especially one which so many known/reported/fixed-post-
release bugs.
And please don't respond if you can't avoid resorting to hyperbole
like what I quoted above.
--
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source
and other randomness
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
