<URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39722 >
2007/11/26, William Allen Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > <URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39722 > > > Castanier Carl wrote: > > ... A > > program who miscompile is NOT cleanly written and I had make an effort > to > > post patch to clean up this code. You can leave this patch as many > others... > > The patch changes the order of the menu, and adds a special case for the > -1 you changed to be the last item instead. hehe there are 2 patchs :) someone had focus me on that point and the second one close your mouth ho, sorry was a pepeto comment :) you can't read them :) Anyway, I can't talk about it since I can't read any tickets and I can't see what I wrote. A compiler that mis-compiles without error messages is not well written. > > A project that doesn't compile with a buggy compiler optimization option > is > not a problem in and of itself. It's called an "option" for a reason. yep, but options must be tested in configure.ac :)) > I had never seen a project who dont compile with -02 or they solv > > immediately the problem. > > I suggest you Google this issue. I know that there were problems at > netbsd, > gimp, ghostscript, .... Some of the best in the business! You need to put -02 option explicitly by CFLAGS. I think that after we've told you "WARNING" and you do it anyway, you are > not being helpful to us. We really appreciate helpful bug reports. So, do reply to me. And we don't appreciate even lousy attempts at crude language. > > > Then, you have to don't tell me too bad 2 times without reading tiles of my submitted bug. -02 is an option into configure.ac and you can test version of gcc to remove this option ; that's close the bug. My purpose was to keep enable -02. You are not center of the world. That all for me. I have answer to previous message from Mr Short who seems have some education. So what your problem with me? Why you simply don't ask? Why you talk of this patch many month after I posted it in such term? Why I'm too bad? DON'T REPLY, I think you and me is over. I will never more post anything. If you see patch from me, it's too bad so close it quick quick quick tks. -- Carl
2007/11/26, William Allen Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Then, you have to don't tell me too bad 2 times without reading tiles of my submitted bug. -02 is an option into
configure.ac and you can test version of gcc to remove this option ; that's close the bug. My purpose was to keep enable -02.
<URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39722 >
Castanier Carl wrote:
> ... A
> program who miscompile is NOT cleanly written and I had make an effort to
> post patch to clean up this code. You can leave this patch as many others...
The patch changes the order of the menu, and adds a special case for the
-1 you changed to be the last item instead.
hehe there are 2 patchs :) someone had focus me on that point and the second one close your mouth
ho, sorry was a pepeto comment :) you can't read them :)
Anyway, I can't talk about it since I can't read any tickets and I can't see what I wrote.
ho, sorry was a pepeto comment :) you can't read them :)
Anyway, I can't talk about it since I can't read any tickets and I can't see what I wrote.
A compiler that mis-compiles without error messages is not well written.
A project that doesn't compile with a buggy compiler optimization option is
not a problem in and of itself. It's called an "option" for a reason.
yep, but options must be tested in
configure.ac :))
> I had never seen a project who dont compile with -02 or they solv
> immediately the problem.
I suggest you Google this issue. I know that there were problems at netbsd,
gimp, ghostscript, .... Some of the best in the business!
You need to put -02 option explicitly by CFLAGS.
I think that after we've told you "WARNING" and you do it anyway, you are
not being helpful to us. We really appreciate helpful bug reports.
So, do reply to me.
And we don't appreciate even lousy attempts at crude language.
You are not center of the world. That all for me. I have answer to previous message from Mr Short who seems have some education. So what your problem with me? Why you simply don't ask? Why you talk of this patch many month after I posted it in such term? Why I'm too bad?
DON'T REPLY, I think you and me is over. I will never more post anything. If you see patch from me, it's too bad so close it quick quick quick tks.
--
Carl
_______________________________________________ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
