On 19 August 2011 03:59, Jacob Nevins <[email protected]>wrote:
> (followups set to -i18n) > > I'd like to propose a definite policy for when translations are > considered orphaned, something like: if a translation hasn't been > touched for two major releases, it's deemed to be orphaned, and updates > from new translators can be accepted without evidence of an attempt to > contact the previous maintainer. (I.e., those translations with 2.1, > 2.0, or 1.14 in the column would currently be "fair game".) > > As part of considering a translation "orphaned", I think we should clear > out the contact details from this table and revert it to "position > vacant", so we don't have a table filled with contact details that > haven't been valid since 1.14.x. (This is not intended to hide credit, > which is still in the po-file and the People file.) I haven't done this > yet, though (and I suspect much of the existing contact info is bogus). > > These are good ideas. The translation wiki pages suggests that some of the translations are actively maintained, while changelogs suggest that no one worked on them for quite some time. Two major releses is a good indicator, too. If no one updated a localization for the entire S2_2 branch (almost two years now, right?), it can be safely assumed to be orphaned. -- Hubert
_______________________________________________ Freeciv-i18n mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-i18n
