On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 9:59 PM, Michael T. Pope <mp...@computer.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Aug 2015 21:02:16 -0500 > Caleb Williams <cale...@gmail.com> wrote: > > ... 0.11.4a > > Please, let us not mess with the numbering scheme. > Well, in that case, see below: > > > I don't think it would be wise > > to just re-release 0.11.4 with this fix. I see no reason why we cannot > > ordinarily wait, but for the fact that this bug seems quite debilitating > > and FreeCol should be kept as usable as possible. > > Now I am confused. You seem to be saying for us not to release a > different build of 0.11.4 as 0.11.4. I do not know why you are saying > this as it was not one of the options I proposed, nor would it be. There > are 0.11.4 binaries out there, the best we can do about them is tell > people not to use them. > I was just trying to head off any discussion of that. 0.11.5 it is. Caleb
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Freecol-developers mailing list Freecol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freecol-developers
