Yes, you're right
but why preclude the possibility to use an laptop for example?
It costs a bit more than a low power box but have much more computational power
and a very low power consumption.
I was only thinking that include some laptops, with Intel ME disabled, wasn't a
bad idea
Il 10 luglio 2018 18:51:33 CEST, Jonas Smedegaard <[email protected]> ha scritto:
>Quoting [email protected] (2018-07-10 16:08:39)
>> Yes, I think It's important to maintain freedom box usable from a low
>
>> CPU machine, but I think that for reach our goal It's necessary to
>use
>> more powerful machines too.
>>
>> It's necessary that decentralized services are fast and efficient,
>> something that a low pc machine can't always grant.
>
>Uhm, the very goal of FreedomBox is to put together things that _can_
>fit on a cheap low-power box.
>
>I agree that not all services relevant for freedom fits that constraint
>
>(or the other constraints for the FreedomBox project) - but fear not:
>Makes great sense to package any and all interesting tools for Debian,
>and makes good among interesting tools to try get most possible
>supported by Plinth (the interface used by FreedomBox), and might also
>make sense to then discuss which of the Debian tools supported by
>Debian
>to include in FreedomBox - and those not included can then easily be
>included in a sister projects FreedomTower and FreedomCluster reusing
>parts from FreedomBox :-)
>
>
> - Jonas
>
>--
> * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
> * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
>
> [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
--
Inviato dal mio dispositivo Android con K-9 Mail. Perdonate la brevità .
_______________________________________________
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
