On 7/14/07, chris evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >But it has no sense. LPTtest is supposed to be a part of FreeDOS and FreeDOS > >itself has own copy of COPYING. Why should every small binary to have own > >copy of this license? > > >Maybe rather to spread it as public domain? > > I thought that all was necessary in a program like this is a small comment > that is is under the GPL at start. >
No, see my other post. It is important to be explicit in your license terms. Just saying "this program is covered under the GNU GPL" is not sufficient. -jh ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
