Hi! I’m rather reader of that list not developer. It takes me 5 minutes to browse this mail thread and based on what I’ve read it takes me another 3 minutes to find where is the source code of command.com alternative named freecom. See here: https://gitlab.com/FreeDOS/base/freecom
Please remember that FreeDos consists of many different programs which are alternative implementation of DOS kernel (here kernel.sys) and tools. So please read the site materials and use your brain. Kind Regards Piotr Kolasinski On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 09:02:05AM -0500, Jim Hall via Freedos-devel wrote: > On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 8:46 AM Green Fog via Freedos-devel > <freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > > > There you go. The 2 requirements for free dos being a thing are > > just not there. not ease of use. I need to use an antique mail > > list for communication and wiki/documentation. It's absurd > > and very not efficient. I am very busy, and I can't afford > > the time to download each of these packages one by one. That > > is not how the source code should be distributed. Ease of use > > is none. Documentations are very bad. The sites linked to are > > web 0.1 material. Good documentation and know-hows are what > > drive further development, so I can say free dos is dead, > > and I will not invest more time on it. > > > > Calling me a troll and telling me not to talk to me? How old > > are you? That is not very welcoming and very immature. Either > > way, I am gone. > > > I'm usually a very nice guy, but I have to call this out: > > If there was ever a prime example of how *not* to ask for help, this > email thread was it. > > > _______________________________________________ > Freedos-devel mailing list > Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
