On Sat, 7 Aug 2004, Luchezar Georgiev wrote: > > This is against exeflat.c of "2035a-UNSTABLE". Neither 2035a (i.e. CVS > > HEAD) nor 2035 have this problem. > > I didn't know that there are TWO kernel builds called 2035a... Perhaps you > should call yours 2035b where b = Bart (a = Arkady ;-)
I was just reflecting what it reports from version.h -- that's the info Jeremy put in, neither Arkady nor myself. In CVS HEAD I see: #define BUILD "2035" #define SUB_BUILD "a" #define KERNEL_VERSION_STRING "1.1.35" /*#REVISION_MAJOR "." #REVISION_MINOR "." #REVISION_SEQ */ #define KERNEL_BUILD_STRING "2035a" /*#BUILD SUB_BUILD */ but in CVS UNSTABLE I see #define BUILD "2035a" #define SUB_BUILD "-UNSTABLE" #define KERNEL_VERSION_STRING "1.1.35a" /*#REVISION_MAJOR "." #REVISION_MINOR "." #REVISION_SEQ */ #define KERNEL_BUILD_STRING "2035a-UNSTABLE" /*#BUILD SUB_BUILD */ I don't know why some people started calling 2035a-UNSTABLE plain 2035a... perhaps just too lazy to type "-UNSTABLE". But it reports that on the screen right? Bart ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com _______________________________________________ Freedos-kernel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-kernel
