Hallo Bart,
#define BUILD "2035"
#define SUB_BUILD "a"
#define KERNEL_VERSION_STRING "1.1.35" /*#REVISION_MAJOR "." #REVISION_MINOR "." #REVISION_SEQ */
#define KERNEL_BUILD_STRING "2035a" /*#BUILD SUB_BUILD */
#define BUILD "2035a"
#define SUB_BUILD "-UNSTABLE"
#define KERNEL_VERSION_STRING "1.1.35a" /*#REVISION_MAJOR "." #REVISION_MINOR "." #REVISION_SEQ */
#define KERNEL_BUILD_STRING "2035a-UNSTABLE" /*#BUILD SUB_BUILD */
I don't know why some people started calling 2035a-UNSTABLE plain 2035a... perhaps just too lazy to type "-UNSTABLE". But it reports that on the screen right?
Sure. It reports quite a lot of things. But if BUILD is defined as 2035 (Bart) and 2035a (Arkady),it may be used for identification too. I hate the build & version dualism (e. g. version should be 2.0.35), but I know that neither this, nor removal of phrases like "All Rights Reserved." that are useless now, nor removal of the f-nodes that prevent programs which modify SFTs from working, will ever happen. OK, long live the holy conservatism that saves the FreeDOS world from the Arkadifying hell ;-G By the way, how is Arkady? Has anybody heard of him recently? I begin to worry about him!
Regards, Lucho
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com _______________________________________________ Freedos-kernel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-kernel
