On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Luchezar Georgiev wrote: > Hallo Bart, > > > There's also a pointless "optimization", that the compiler can do for us > > as well. > > Will Watcom (the only compiler you recognise) do this?
Of course, I'm not going to state this without checking. > Borland won't, I'm sure. So my optimisation is NOT pointless. We'll make a deal. If Borland fixes their bug in 32RTM as part of open sourcing their old 16bit targetting compiler (even lower than the chance that RBIL will be updated) I'll go for it ;) I do recognize other compilers but... http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=freedos-kernel&m=106373357329924&w=2 " re: BC optimizations: BC isn't a target for freedos optimizations; there's one and only one target to optimize for : WATCOM. so BC specific optimization is a waste of time (ours and yours) tom " This just being tom's opinion but I still agree -- I even agree more than I did a couple months ago, that's why I rejected my own idea of using "_seg *" pointers. I played for a while again with Turbo C++ back then but in the end decided that the difference was just too big. Bart ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Freedos-kernel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-kernel
