I never used Virtual Box, but I can say this: VMware is very good, *except* for DOS graphics programs. graphics screen is veeeeery slow. With Win98 and a special drivers it is good. Network is ok, I could only share folders as network disks.
Qemu is faster for graphics in DOS. It has some limitations and is harder to setup. Network ok too. DOSEMU is fast i graphics too. Network is packet driver only but you can map any letter to any Linus folder, so in fact this is better than shared folders or netwoked drivers. Alain Giorgos escreveu: > Hi!!! :-) > > I read yesterday, a mail from chieffy (from FSM) to FSM subscribers, that > points at these pages: > http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/articles/using_virtualbox_to_run_ubuntu > http://digg.com/linux_unix/Using_VirtualBox_to_run_Ubuntu_and_any_other_operating_system > > It refers to http://virtualbox.org/ (that comes with freeware binaries and > open source sources). > Since I heard about it at chieffy's mail for the first time, I want to ask > you: > Is someone here, familiar with it? Can he compare it with VMWARE Server? Is > it better or worse? Is it faster or slower? Is it emulating FreeDOS > properly? What about (free) support options? > If someone is familiar with it, please share his experience - opinion, with > us. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
