Michael, Eric, Dave

I just altered my EMail setup to better track this thread.  I have missed
some messages.

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Michael B. Brutman
<mbbrut...@brutman.com>wrote:

>
> John,
>
> Just to make sure I understand ...
>
> You are running a batch file that is doing "net use" to setup printer
> shares, a file share, and loads nansi.sys.  And the output to the screen
> during that time is around 8.5 chars per second?
>
> Just as a comparison, running the FreeDOS Beta of 1.1 under VirtualBox I
> can go to c:\fdos\doc\mtcp and execute "type ftpsrv.txt".  The entire time
> to watch that 37KB file scroll by is around 7 seconds, or about 5200 chars
> per second including the scrolling time.  (The time to scroll is longer
> than the time to print chars.)
>
> Is VirtualBox slow because of what you are doing in those batch files, or
> is it slow no matter what you do?  For example, try my little test there
> and see how fast it goes.  We need to isolate what is causing your
> slowdown.  And please try this with both TSRs and device drivers loaded and
> without so that we can see if it is a TSR or device driver problem.
>
> I have never heard of something that slow before in VirtualBox. As an
> alternative, you can try VMWare to see if it is something specific to
> VirtualBox.  (I have found problems in VirtualBox before related to
> programs that reprogram the programmable interrupt timer.  The mTCP PING
> program exposed it.  It only affected PING while it was running.)
>
> RAM should not be the issue.  But laptop hardware tends to throttle the
> speed if it is not plugged into the wall and allowed to run at full speed.
>  I doubt this is your problem, but just in case, please clarify that the
> laptops are on wall power and are set to run at maximum CPU speed while on
> wall power.
>
> FDAPM and APMDOS are only introduced as a way to conserve battery power or
> reduce electricity consumption when used with wall power.  Which reduces
> heat, which is always a good thing ...
>
> mTCP requires its own network adapter and can not co-exist with MS-Client.
>  The same is true for WATTCP based applications.  If you are trying to use
> both the MS-Client and mTCP or WATTCP programs at the same time on the same
> adapter then you need to add another adapter.  Each of those programs
> assumes that they own the adapter and will fight each other in fun ways.
>
>
> Mike
>
>
>


-- 
Cheers
John S Wolter
------------------------
LinkedIn: johnswolter <http://www.linkedin.com/in/johnswolter>

- Mailto:johnswol...@wolterworks.com
- Desk: 734-408-1263
- USA, Eastern Standard Time, -5 GMT, -4 GMT DST
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user

Reply via email to