Tom, why do you always misunderstand? You really think I didn't know this already?
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 6:57 AM, Tom Ehlert <t...@drivesnapshot.de> wrote: >> DOSEMU2 (Linux-hosted) is still being worked upon, and there have been DOSEMU runs on Linux natively but still needs 16-bit DOS (kernel, shell, utils) files to function. >> efforts to port the current FreeDOS kernel to GCC (with 16-bit support >> patches). Bart has (mostly) made it compile, so far. >> Since that (also) works on x64, "That" meaning DOSEMU, hence it can run atop Linux (32-bit or 64-bit). >> the latest efforts should again continue to prolong the lifetime of DOS >> programs, which is good >> since even traditional BIOS/CSM will "probably" disappear by 2020. "Prolong" as in finally be widely accepted into Linux distros without being relegated to "contrib" or "universe" (multiverse? I forget) due to "using non-Free build tools". > this is simply nonsense. Ugh. > a GCC compiled FreeDOS kernel will work *exactly* where the standard > WatcomC compiled works; no more , no less (bugs aside). Right. I never said otherwise. > the GCC kernel is still 16 bit stuff, and requires a working BIOS. Yes, but DOSEMU fakes all of that, so there's (probably?) no real BIOS access here. (I guess V86 mode could maybe do it, if needed, but that's not available under x64, more or less. There are some extremely obscure third-party hacks, but I've never investigated. Just for completeness, read [old] http://v86-64.sf.net if curious, but it's probably not totally reliable. I think VT-X is probably a better path going forward and is already partially supported under DOSEMU2.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
