thanks. There’s enough jargon in this that I’m not sure I understand. What’s the difference in level of QA between freeipa in Stream and RHEL? I’d be happy to have new versions of IPA sooner, if they’ve actually been tested well enough that they’re ready for the next RHEL release. Are things in good enough shape that it would make sense to convert to stream now?
Do you think the in-place upgrade of Centos to RHEL would be safe to do with freeipa? I’d assume there’s no actual difference in the packages. I’m really only concerned with IPA. We use Ubuntu for everything else. We’re a computer science department. Our researchers want Ubuntu, and we have to do what our users want. > On Dec 9, 2020, at 11:23 AM, Alexander Bokovoy <aboko...@redhat.com> wrote: > > I can only talk about FreeIPA and few other projects I am involved with. > For example, we are getting incredible feedback from both Rawhide and > RHEL 8.x QA processes for FreeIPA 4.9.0 release candidates. The packages > are not yet in RHEL 8.x development composes as we do fixes to issues > found through the QA pre-verification work. Once overall state of the > release candidate is at the level RHEL IdM QA team accepts, those > packages will get to RHEL composes and eventually land in C8S (once the > infra is ready). Once C8S is there in full capacity and running upstream > CI tests on it would become a reality, we'll see even more shortening of > that feedback loop length.
_______________________________________________ FreeIPA-users mailing list -- freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to freeipa-users-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org
