On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Scott Gregory Miller wrote:
> >
> > To add support for MSKs to RequestClient, the obvious place to add it is
> > ClientUtil.getKey, but I would have to overload it with another version
> > that takes a MapHandler as an argument, and that's ugly and inefficient,
> > because the key might not even be a MSK. So I could add a isMSK method to
> > ClientUtil that takes the key string and checks. I'd do it in fillBuckets
> > before the ClientKey is initialized, and if it returns true, I'd
> > instantiate a MapHandler and run the key string through it first.
>
> I don't think having a MapHandler as an argument to ClientUtil.getKey is
*isn't* too terrible, my bad.
> too terrible. Why not have a static pointer to the MapHandler somewhere
> so thtat ClientUtil.getKey can call the maphandler if it finds out the key
> is a mapKey. This would keep the code out of the actual clients and keep
> it in the library.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freenet-dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
