On Tue, 26 Dec 2000 Scott G Miller wrote:
> Different kind of security. Freenet is perfectly fine from a "Dont let
> anyone find out whats going on/being transmitted" sort of stance.
I'm thinkin' Freenet is also good for secure publication. There is a lot
to be said for knowing the document I'm viewing over the web is signed by
the person / business / government I think it is. The built in document
security deserves much applause.
> The argument is over "Dont let anyone find out we're running
> Freenet" which is an arguable problem.
Yeah. If I were a Chinese dissident or a Cocaine dealer, I would have my
transient flag turned on at the minimum and tunnelling through another
protocol would also be smart. Monitoring the 'net is not a small task,
one that needs serious investment. I'm not all that worried about it.
_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
