No, you're blowing that out of proportion. The idea is give people
technologies that are less difficult to fuck up. Clusters give people a
false sense of security, as discussed (gateway capture increases
liability, can't really ensure trusted links in truely dangerous
environments).
Scott
On 30 Dec 2000, Mr.Bad wrote:
> >>>>> "SGM" == Scott Gregory Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> SGM> This is one of the shadows over proposals like clustering
> SGM> that rely on humans to create the security. In many cases,
> SGM> the security they create it only in their heads.
>
> This has got to be the most back-assward reasoning I've ever
> heard. "Most people will misuse this feature, so don't give it to
> anybody."
>
> ~Mr. Bad
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> /\____/\ Mr. Bad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> \ / Pigdog Journal | http://pigdog.org/ | *Stay*Real*Bad*
> | (X \x)
> ( ((**) "If it's not bad, don't do it.
> \ <vvv> If it's not crazy, don't say it." - Ben Franklin
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freenet-dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
