On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 07:24:44PM -0800, Mr.Bad wrote: > >>>>> "IC" == Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > IC> I don't think that there is any system that could facilitate > IC> scalable information request/retrieval which doesn't at least > IC> place some trust somewhere. > > I totally agree. However, the person I was responding to (gosh, lost > that message already) had said that Freenet now was a "zero-trust" > system. I think it's more like a 100%-trust system. Well, I don't agree with either. I think that you do need to assume that most (don't ask for a percentage!) Freenet nodes will not be hell-bent on your destruction. This will be a reasonable assumption if/when Freenet is widely deployed and used. 100%-trust would imply that even one corrupt node would screw the system, this would clearly be a rediculous scenario. Ian.
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Talk To Strangers Chris Anderson
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Talk To Strangers Scott G. Miller
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Talk To Strangers Mr . Bad
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Talk To Stranger... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Talk To Stra... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Talk To... Mr . Bad
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Talk To... Timm Murray
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Tal... Mr . Bad
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Tal... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Tal... Mr . Bad
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Tal... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Tal... Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Tal... Mr . Bad
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Tal... Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Tal... Mr . Bad
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Tal... Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Tal... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Tal... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Tal... Timm Murray
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Talk To Strangers Chris Anderson
- RE: [Freenet-dev] Don't Talk To Strangers Benjamin Coates