> Right. But let's say that there are 15 nodes protected by a shield > node. That means that there are 15 addresses out there with the IP > address of the shield node included -- and prominently featured as the > protector. Like, "HERE IS SOMEONE PROTECTING NODES -> ". Well - yeah, but assuming that the default functionality is to allow others to use your node as a shield (and the more I think about it, the less inclined I am to make this optional), then it won't mean much that someone else uses your node in this way, since all it means is that someone else managed to find your node address. Also, it could be arranged so that nodes collect a pool of potential shield nodes and use them on a rotation. Ian.
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Oper... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Oper... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Oper... Scott Gregory Miller
- [Freenet-dev] Shadow Nodes (Was: Node Operator Anonym... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Shadow Nodes (Was: Node Operat... Mr . Bad
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Shadow Nodes (Was: Node Op... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Shadow Nodes (Was: Nod... Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Shadow Nodes (Was: Node Op... Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Shadow Nodes (Was: Nod... Mr . Bad
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Shadow Nodes (Was:... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Shadow Nodes ... Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Shadow No... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Shadow Nodes (Was:... Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Shadow Nodes ... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Shadow No... Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Shadow No... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Shadow Nodes (Was: Node Op... Travis Bemann
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - the issue... Matthew Toseland