Re: [Freenet-dev] Shadow Nodes (Was: Node Operator Anonymity - theissues)

[Brandon]

Somebody:
> > For a cluster, the same number of addresses will go out, but there's
> > no indication that the gateway is actually a gateway. Yes, it's out
> > there, and probly in higher proportion than if it wasn't a gateway,
> > but it's still not totally obvious that the clustered nodes even
> > exist.

Scott:
> This is also true.  However, the capturing of a shield node would not
> expose the nodes its shielding, since it doesnt keep a list of its
> shieldees, its just protects them on-the-fly.

It would have to keep a list if it is going to send along messages meant
for nodes it is shielding. Unless they're transient.



_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev