> No it doesn't. The shield node has a public/private keypair. Nodes using > the shield encrypt their address using the shield's public key, and attach > the ciphertext to their reference. The shield only needs to decrypt that > field with its private key and send the message to the address it > recovers. It doesn't need to keep any list at all. Ah, I see. Ignore my other messages on this thread then. _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Shadow Nodes (Was: Node Op... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Shadow Nodes (Was: Nod... Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Shadow Nodes (Was: Node Op... Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Shadow Nodes (Was: Nod... Mr . Bad
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Shadow Nodes (Was:... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Shadow Nodes ... Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Shadow No... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Shadow Nodes (Was:... Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Shadow Nodes ... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Shadow No... Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Shadow No... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Shadow Nodes (Was: Node Op... Travis Bemann
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - the issue... Matthew Toseland
- RE: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - the issue... Benjamin Coates
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - the ... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... Oskar Sandberg
