> > I don't think someone would make a cancer node to be useful; they > would make one to be destructive. > > Also, it'd be fairly easy to adapt Fred to do things like: bury > requests, return garbled results, etc. etc. w/r/t KSKs, I don't think > they're the only problem: As far as I can tell, Fred does -not- check > CHKs or do other verification on data it gets. Having spent nearly 12 hours a day for a month to implement this, I can say fairly certainly that Fred does verify *all* the data passing through it. _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
- Re: [Freenet-dev] PK key ex... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] PK key ex... Mr . Bad
- Re: [Freenet-dev] PK key ex... Matthew Toseland
- Re: [Freenet-dev] PK key ex... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] PK key ex... Mr . Bad
- Re: [freenet-devl] Re: [Fre... Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] Re: [Fre... Mr . Bad
- Re: [freenet-devl] Re: [Fre... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] PK key ex... Mr . Bad
- Re: [freenet-devl] Re: [Fre... Don Marti
- Re: [freenet-devl] Re: [Fre... Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] Re: [Fre... Mr . Bad
- Re: [Freenet-dev] PK key exchange Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [Freenet-dev] PK key exchange Adam Langley
- Re: [Freenet-dev] PK key exchange Scott Gregory Miller