On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 01:21:51PM -0800, Mr.Bad wrote: <> > I agree with Oskar that what I described wouldn't solve this > problem. The only thing I can think of that would is having the > routing algorithms try to preserve diversity in the routing table -- > which would probably be hard to do right. That's "wack a mole". What is physically a single node can have as many addresses as it wants in order to fool other nodes into thinking there is diversity. -- 'DeCSS would be fine. Where is it?' 'Here,' Montag touched his head. 'Ah,' Granger smiled and nodded. Oskar Sandberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
- Re: [Freenet-dev] PK key exchange Steven Hazel
- Re: [Freenet-dev] PK key exchan... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] PK key ex... Mr . Bad
- Re: [Freenet-dev] PK key ex... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] PK key ex... Mr . Bad
- Re: [Freenet-dev] PK key ex... Matthew Toseland
- Re: [Freenet-dev] PK key ex... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] PK key ex... Mr . Bad
- Re: [freenet-devl] Re: [Fre... Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] Re: [Fre... Mr . Bad
- Re: [Freenet-dev] PK key ex... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] PK key ex... Mr . Bad
- Re: [freenet-devl] Re: [Fre... Don Marti
- Re: [freenet-devl] Re: [Fre... Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] Re: [Fre... Mr . Bad
- Re: [Freenet-dev] PK key exchange Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [Freenet-dev] PK key exchange Adam Langley
- Re: [Freenet-dev] PK key exchange Scott Gregory Miller