On Tue, 05 Jun 2001, Andrew po-jung Ho wrote:
>
> Hi Tim,
> I am agreeing with you that FreePM's templates may be adequate for
>non-researchers. The reason that I put a question mark at the end is that it is a
>little too early to know how adequate it is (in its current form). There have been
>comments about templates before and I refer you to the following messages:
>
I'll rephrase the question to make it more direct.
What information is missing from the FreePM database that would cause
you to think that FreePM is not / could not be a valuable research tool?
RE: Information in templates. As discussed, the templates can and
should be marked up with XHTML as appropriate. The actual tags should
come from this community. The templates that are currently finished
use only <icd></icd> and <charge_code></charge_code> tags inside the
note itself. It is not my domain that can/should choose the tags that
should be used. I will provide any guidance that I can and conflict
resolution. But clinicians and researchers together know much more
about the tag set needed than I. This is the key benefit to being
able to build your own templates. The user can put the needed tags
into the system. This can lead to a chaotic situation if not
administered correctly, that is where I can help.
Gotta run...
--
Tim Cook, President - FreePM,Inc.
http://www.FreePM.com Office: (731) 884-4126
ONLINE DEMO: http://www.freepm.org:8080/FreePM
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
FreePM Support List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freepm-discuss
