Lee W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Right now I have the 3com handling the pools not FreeRadius. I was > told on this list that Freeradius can't handle a upper limit on > address pools, that you can set a start limit with > Framed-IP-Address, and it will assign up from said IP so I should > use my hardware.
Yes. > The RFC said Framed-Pool should be a string of the assigned address > pool, if supported by the NAS so I think thats what I'm doing. You should double-check your NAS documentation for what *it* wants. > The Framed-IP-Address RFC said that a set a value of 0xFFFFFFFF > indicates that the NAS should allow the user to select an address > (e.g. Negotiated) and the value 0xFFFFFFFE indicates that the NAS > should select an address for the user (e.g. Assigned from a pool of > addresses kept by the NAS. Which in my case would be (pool1). So the > only thing I can think I'm missing is the 0xFFFFFFFE setting for > Framed-IP-Address. Am I close, or did I miss the boat all together? > :-) You should probably do that. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
