Dziobek, Isabel wrote:
Dear All,
I have some questions in regard to the FreeSurfer group analyses (I am using
the 3.0 Version), for which I would appreciate your help.
I am trying to compare a patient to a control group with respect to cortical
thickness (regressing out variables such as age and IQ) and also to see if
associations exist in specific ROIs between cortical thickness and cognitive
variables (for the groups separately).
I started constructing a group descriptor file containing the two classes
(patient and control) and the variable age. First, I wanted to compare the
groups disregarding any other variable and so I constructed the following
contrast vector: (1 -1 0), assuming doss and thinking that the ³0² meant
that this column of the design matrix would not be taken into account in the
model. However, this yielded the same result as running (1 -1 1).
Do I have to construct a separate fsgd file only containing the classes and
then a contrast vector (1 -1)?
It looks like you did it correctly. Where they *exactly* the same? Down
to 5 or 6 decimal places? It could be that there was no real age effect,
so it would not matter what you put as the final element.
What about regressing out more than 1 variable (e.g. age and IQ), how does
the contrast vector have to look like then?
You'd add another Variable to the FSGD. Then you'd just [1 -1 0 0].
Also, how do I look at correlations between those variables and cortical
thickness for the groups separately?
Use DODS. You will have to change your contrast vector.
When loading the scatter plots of the
fsgd, the regression line for the separate groups seems to run always
parallel, which does not seem very likely (see attached jpg). Are these
regression lines at all? Where can I obtain the Rs in numbers?
Yes they are regression. It is because you are using DOSS. The "SS"
means "Same Slope", which is what you are seeing. You technically cannot
get an R value for multiple regression, only single regression. However,
you can get something like an R using a partial model fit, but I'd have
to think about how to compute it from the regression coefficients.
Can I, alternatively, stream out the numbers for the cortical thickness of a
defined ROI to then run correlations in SPSS. Where would I find those
numbers?
Do you want all the vertices in the ROI or just an average over the ROI?
I was also wondering about corrections for intracranial vault. Does the
registration to the group¹s average brain takes care of differences in
overall head size or is it advisable to put icv as a separate regressor (as
is done in very few studies)?
This is not taken into account, so you can include it as a covariate.
Thanks a lot for your help and happy holidays,
Isabel
**************************************
Isabel Dziobek, PhD
Postdoctoral Research Fellow
Independent Junior Research Group
Neurocognition of Decision-Making
Max-Planck Institute for Human Development
Lentzeallee 94
14195 Berlin
Phone: +49 30 82406 619
Fax: +49 30 82406 616
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
--
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone Number: 617-724-2358
Fax: 617-726-7422
In order to help us help you, please follow the steps in:
surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
