Bruce, Are the things I'm noticing due to using 3.0.3 for everything (including topology fixer) up to final surfaces, then using 3.0.4? So I guess the other "odd" surfaces are acceptable to trust (excluding the medial temp lobe)?
Thanks! Derin > Hi Derin, > > it's pretty much impossible to tell if surfaces are crossing from a 2d > slice. This looks like there was an incorrectly fixed topological defect > in the hippocampus. You could manually correct it in the wm.mgz volume, > but we don't really care about the surfaces in this region (cerebral > cortex) > > cheers, > Bruce > On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Derin Cobia wrote: > >> I reran our subjects from "final_surfaces" on through autorecon3 using >> 3.0.4 to correct for the pial surface crossover at the midline (as >> recommended by Bruce). Most things look fine, except that there are >> many >> portions of the surfaces that appear to "bunch" together. In one >> extreme >> example it appears that the white and pial surface cross. I've attached >> some jpgs to demonstrate what I mean. The close-up is r medial temporal >> area, while the other shows the "bunching" in the l superior portion, >> and >> at the midline. I understand that the crossing is not correct, but do >> the >> other surfaces look appropriate? Thanks. >> >> -Derin >> >> > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
