ok. That's good enough for me by now. Thanks a lot Inês
2007/9/20, Bruce Fischl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > if you draw a label outlining the region you can use > mris_anatomical_stats -l <label file> to get the thickness standard > deviations I think. Usually they aren't that interesting because the > thickness varies with geometry (e.g. sulci are thinner than gyri). > > cheers, > Bruce > > > On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Inês Souta wrote: > > > Well, I'm dealing with a patient with an heterogeneous lesion. Somehow, > the > > lesion area seems to have misled the algorithm in terms of white and > pial > > surface definition, leading to an erroneous cortical thickness measure > in > > that area. What I was interested in analising (if possible) is the > > dispersion related to the thickness measures in that area. > > > > 2007/9/20, Bruce Fischl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> > >> what exactly do you mean? Spatial standard deviations? Usually those > >> aren't > >> terribly interesting, and it's the cross subject ones that are more > >> useful, but that doesn't sound like what you mean. > >> > >> Bruce > >> > >> > >> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Inês Souta wrote: > >> > >>> Hi there, > >>> > >>> How can I get a standard deviation map of the thickness measurements > ina > >>> subject? > >>> > >>> Inês > >>> > >
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
