Hi Ian,
does this mess up the ?h.white or ?h.pial surfaces? Or the aseg.mgz? If
not, I wouldn't worry about it.
cheers,
Bruce
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008, Ian Malone wrote:
To illustrate the issue, this is a slice from one of the problematic volumes.
The blue outlines surround non-zero voxels, the regions around the edges
carry on parallel to those planes.
Ian
Ian Malone wrote:
It's not terrible; it can be worked around. But it does feel more like a
bug than a feature, as these voxels are un-connected with any in the brain.
It looks a bit like the edge of a bounding box.
Thanks,
Ian
Bruce Fischl wrote:
Hi Ian,
mri_watershed minimizes a risk functional in which we weigh the cost of
leaving non-brain voxels to be much less than stripping true brain ones,
so it does sometimes leave stuff around. Is this causing any problems?
Bruce
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Ian Malone wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone encountered this before? I have a few volumes for which
mri_watershed output volumes are fine apart from some non-zero voxels
near the edges (which are not connected to the brain). The volumes are
in transverse format and the most noticeable effect is some inferior
slices (neck, lower jaw) which are not being masked out, though there are
also some voxels close to the coronal edges. For both sets of edges there
is a one or two voxel thick layer parallel to either the coronal or
transverse plane.
This is with Freesurfer 4.0.2, T1 images in Analyze format.
Thanks for your time,
Ian Malone
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
