Hi Rahul,

Thanks for the input! 

 

I'm afraid I don't see how the atlases agree with regard to the medial SFG, 
since only a tiny portion of the area of interest is in SFG according to the 
Destriuex annotation (SFG is the uppermost parcellation in the anterior half of 
the hemisphere in that image). So whether or not it extends into the SFG would 
change with just a slight change in smooting kernel.

 

 

Thank you!

LMR


 
> Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:12:08 -0400
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Destrieux or Desikan/Ron Killiany
> From: ra...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> To: lari...@gmail.com
> CC: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> 
> Hi Lars,
> 
> From looking at the images you sent, your area of interest is clearly in
> the anterior portion of the cingulate gyrus as well as in the medial
> portion of the superior frontal gyrus (as well as a small portion in the
> corpus callosum). I think both atlases agree on this quite consistently.
> 
> Hope this helps.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Rahul
> 
> --
> Rahul S. Desikan
> ra...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> 
> > Hi,
> > I have an area of significance on the mesial surface of the hemisphere
> > (please see attached tiffs). I would like to know if it is exclusively in
> > the cingulate or in cingulate and SFG. The prolbem is that the two atlases
> > don't agree. The upper more than half of this significant area is in SFG
> > according to lh.aparc.annot and in cingulate gyrus and sulcus according to
> > lh.aparc.a2005s.annot.
> >
> > I know there have been some issues before with cingulate and SFG in the
> > Destrieux atals (
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg05399.html)
> > but it's unlcear to me whether these have been resolved. As you can see
> > from
> > the tiffs, in lh.aparc.annot the significant area is inside the corpus
> > callosum (a small part), caudal and rostral ant. cingulate, and SFG. In
> > lh.aparc.a2005s.annot it is inside pericallosal sulcus, g. cingulate main
> > part, s. cingulate main part, and only a very small part of it extends
> > into
> > SFG.
> > These are substantially different interpretations. Is one atlas more
> > accurate in this region?
> >
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
> > --
> > yours,
> > LMR
> > _______________________________________________
> > Freesurfer mailing list
> > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> 
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to