yes.
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Wayne Su wrote:
Thank you Bruce,
So, if I want to report the volume of the Corpus Callosum, I should add up
the volumes of CC_Posterior, CC_Mid_Posterior, CC_Central, CC_Mid_Anterior,
CC_Anterior only. The ctx-?h-corpuscalosum/wm-?h-corpuscallosum is just
useless and better to remove them from wmparc.mgz since they corrupted the
wmparc volume. The aseg.mgz is right one to look at Corpus Callosum area. Am
I right?
Wayne
On 29/04/09 11:10 AM, "Bruce Fischl" <[email protected]> wrote:
you're probably right. We used to segement the cc on the surface, but
this wasn't nearly as accurate as in the volume, which replaced it.
cheers
Bruce
On Wed,
29 Apr 2009, Wayne Su wrote:
The Freesurfer 4.3 segments the cc into 5 parts. But the wmparc.mgz has both
5 parts along with ctx-?h-corpuscallosum/ wm-?h-corpuscallosum. I think they
should not co-exist. Maybe I¹m wrong.
Wayne
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
