Ok, I would be interested in your damaged white mater tools when it's released (or even if its in a generally usable form now) as I'm working with a large data set of multiple sclerosis subjects.
Cheers, -Sam On 30/11/2009 11:54 PM, Bruce Fischl wrote: > not for the default workflow, no. There are other things we are working on > such as damaged white matter estimation that would benefit, but nothing > released. > > cheers > Bruce > On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Samuel Inverso wrote: > >> Thank you for the quick reply Bruce. >> I'm new to freesurfer, do you know if there is any benefit to including >> T2 in the process workflow somewhere? >> >> Cheers, >> >> -Sam >> >> On 30/11/2009 11:35 PM, Bruce Fischl wrote: >>> yes, just the T1. >>> >>> cheers, >>> Bruce >>> On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Samuel Inverso wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Freesurfers, >>>> >>>> Looking through the mail archives it seems T1 and T2 runs for a single >>>> subject should not be combined when doing recon-all. >>>> Is this still the case? >>>> >>>> Thank you for your time, >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> -Sam >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Freesurfer mailing list >>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer >>>> >>>> >>>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Freesurfer mailing list >> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
