Hi Karl,you could try including average cortical thickness over the entire hemisphere as a covariate. This was Mike Harms' suggestion, and I think a good one.
cheers Bruce On Thu, 8 Apr 2010, Liukarl wrote:
Hello, Freesurfer experts: I noticed for analyzing the results from autorecon2, the intracranial volume are controlled as covariate in some publications. Is there any corresponding covariate for cortical results from autorecon3, cortical thickness, surface, and volume? In my current study, there are two group: one is a group with less optimal developmental environment and the other is control. I noticed that without any covariate, the r square from cortical measure and group variable was really low, only accounting for 2%. Is any standard way to analyze the cortical data? Thanks! Karl _________________________________________________________________ MSNÊ®Äê»ØÀ¡£¬Ã¿Î»Óû§¿ÉÃâ·Ñ»ñµÃ¼ÛÖµ25ÔªµÄ¿¨°Í˹»ù·´²¡¶¾Èí¼þ2010¼¤»îÂ룬¿ìÀ´ÁìÈ¡£¡ http://kaba.msn.com.cn/?k=1
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
