Hi Jürgen, 2010/5/27 Jürgen Hänggi <[email protected]>: > For SPM, it has been shown that the FDR procedure based on height threshold > (FDRp) is not appropriate in the random Gaussian field theory framework > (Chumbley et al., 2010; Chumbley and Friston, 2009, both published in > NeuroImage). Sorry could you elaborate on this a little bit? I believe this was not the conclusion of the Chumbley et al., 2010 paper... Maybe I'm getting something wrong. Please explain.
> Therefore, in SPM8 FDRc (based on the cluster volume) was > implemented and should be preferred over FDRp, isn't it? SPM8 implements topological FDR over peaks - spm_uc_peakFDR.m and spm_P_peakFDR.m . Best regards, Chris _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list [email protected] https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
