Hi, all, I have some questions about performing the FDR correction in Qdec.
I ran recon-all on all my subjects, then ran the surface group analysis following the Qdec tutorial. There are 3 factors in the qdec.table.dat file: age, gender and diagnosis. In the Design tab of Qdec, I selected the discrete factor 'diagnosis' for analysis. When the analysis was done, there is a description "Does the average thickness differ between Diseased and Normal?" in the Display tab. I think this should be the uncorrected map. Then I tried to run the FDR correction for multiple comparisons. I set the rate to be 0.05 and 0.01 respectively. However, I found no difference between the results using different rates. In the Terminal, the information are also the same: "MRISfdr2vwth(): np = 163842, nv = 163842 Found 107008 of 163842 vertices above FDR threshold (of 1.48619)" I wonder whether I did the analysis correctly. Are such results possible or reasonable? Thank you in advance. Best, Xiaojing
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
