Great, thank you for your rapid response, Marie
On 18 oct. 10, at 17:19, Martin Reuter wrote: > Hi everyone, > > it is ok to run 5.0 cross sectionally and use that data for 5.1 base > and > long. We will try hard to make this work, even if new cross sectional > files are needed (they will then be created in the base or long > stream). > However, these are reasons, why it might make sense to wait with the > cross sectionals also: > - there might be changes that result in slightly different cross > sectional results when processing it with 5.1, and in more stable > motion > correction. Especially if you have cases where motion correction fails > in 5.0 (and works with the fixed mri_robust_template), you should > wait. > - when reporting results in a paper, you will have to explain the more > complicated setup > - the whole concept of edits will be looked at and changed, so it is > unclear at the moment, how/if cross sectional edits will be propagated > into the base and long stream. > > Release date target is end of November. (This is concerning the parts > that I am involved with, not sure if there are significant other > improvements that cannot wait for a later release, eg. in the cross > sectional stream and that take more time to include). But we really > want > to get 5.1 out soon, so I guess in the case of doubt, other stuff > would > have to wait for 5.2. > > We have a meeting Wednesday. If the release target changes based on > the > discussion, we'll let you know Wed. afternoon, but that is unlikely. > > Best, Martin > > > On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 09:20 -0500, Derin Cobia wrote: >> So if I understand correctly, you would not recommend getting a jump >> start on cross-sectional processing and editing under 5.0, rerunning >> everything under 5.1 once it comes out, then run (for the first time) >> longitudinal under 5.1? Are there going to be some incompatibilities >> with 5.1, where it cannot be run on top of 5.0 data? Thanks. >> >> >> -Derin >> >> >> >> On Oct 18, 2010, at 7:54 AM, Bruce Fischl wrote: >> >>> I'll leave that for Martin.... >>> >>> Bruce >>> On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, Pedro Paulo de Magalhães Oliveira Junior wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Bruce, >>>> >>>> What's the ETA for 5.1? >>>> >>>> thanks >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Pedro Paulo de Magalhães Oliveira Junior >>>> Diretor de Operações >>>> Netfilter & SpeedComm Telecom >>>> -- www.netfilter.com.br >>>> -- For mobile: http://www.netfilter.com.br/mobile >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:39, Bruce Fischl >>>> <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Marie, >>>>> >>>>> wait for 5.1. Martin has made some significant improvements. >>>>> >>>>> cheers >>>>> Bruce >>>>> On Mon, 18 Oct >>>>> 2010, Marie Schaer wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I am planing to process a longitudinal dataset with 3 >>>>>> timepoints. Is >>>>>> it worthy to begin already the cross-sectional processing with >>>>>> version >>>>>> 5.0 and then wait version 5.1 to continue from the template >>>>>> part. Or >>>>>> would you advice me to wait the release of version 5.1 for the >>>>>> entire >>>>>> processing? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you for your help, >>>>>> >>>>>> Marie >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Freesurfer mailing list >>>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >>>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Freesurfer mailing list >>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person >>>>> to whom it >>>>> is >>>>> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error >>>>> and the >>>>> e-mail >>>>> contains patient information, please contact the Partners >>>>> Compliance >>>>> HelpLine at >>>>> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent >>>>> to you in >>>>> error >>>>> but does not contain patient information, please contact the >>>>> sender and >>>>> properly >>>>> dispose of the e-mail. >>>>> >>>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Freesurfer mailing list >>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer >>> >>> >>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to >>> whom it is >>> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and >>> the e-mail >>> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance >>> HelpLine at >>> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to >>> you in error >>> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender >>> and properly >>> dispose of the e-mail. >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Freesurfer mailing list >> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
