Hi Yang,

Are the slices before and after this slice the same as this one?

> Hi Bruce,
>
> Do you know how to fix it?
>
> Yang
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Bruce Fischl
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Then I must be a topologica defect
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 10, 2011, at 10:37 PM, Yang Liu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Sebastian,
>>
>> Yes. It is Macaque. There is no aseg.
>>
>> Yang
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Sebastian Moeller
>> <<[email protected]>
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 10, 2011, at 19:12 , Bruce Fischl wrote:
>>>
>>> > Does the aseg label that as ventricle?
>>>
>>>         This pretty much looks like macaque data, so I think there is
>>> no
>>> aseg for that. I would love to be corrected on that point though.
>>>
>>> Best
>>>        Sebastian
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Jan 10, 2011, at 9:34 PM, Yang Liu < <[email protected]>
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Hi Khoa,
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks for your reply.
>>> >> I attached the snapshot of the same slice with brainmask.mgz. You
>>> can
>>> see clearly that the green and yellow surface at the wrong regions.
>>> They
>>> doesn't look like  ventricles to me.
>>> >> It is strange that even the green surface doesn't follow the
>>> original
>>> wm.mgz, though the wm.mgz as attached in the previous email
>>> >> has very well defined boundaries near the wrong regions.
>>> >> Any idea to correct this?
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Yang
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Khoa Nguyen
>>> <<[email protected]>
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> Hi Yang,
>>> >>
>>> >> To edit the pial surface, you want to use brainmask.mgz.
>>> >>
>>> >> As for the wm.mgz, you're right in that control points isn't the
>>> solution. Control points are to fix intensity problem, but you can also
>>> add
>>> wm voxels manually to fix any wm defects. In this case, adding that
>>> many
>>> control points would probably make the situation worse because the
>>> entire
>>> area will brighten and that would potentially extend the surfaces to
>>> include
>>> grey matter.
>>> >>
>>> >> Is the area you pointed out by any chance the ventricle? If it is,
>>> then
>>> it doesn't matter that the white surface includes it. It's hard to tell
>>> with
>>> just this image. Do you mind sending a snapshot of the brainmask.mgz
>>> for
>>> this slice?
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Yang Liu wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi Freesurferers,
>>> >>
>>> >> I am correcting some defects in the white matter surface (yellow)
>>> and
>>> the
>>> >> pial surfaces (red). But I am not very sure of which volume I should
>>> work
>>> >> on.
>>> >> I did several experiments on editing one volume at a time.
>>> >>
>>> >> For pial (the red) surface, I edited brain.mgz first. I found it
>>> corrected
>>> >> some pial defects.
>>> >> However, I found one previous post here said the volume that should
>>> be
>>> >> edited is brainmask.mgz.
>>> >> So the second time I only changed brainmask.mgz. It also works.
>>> >>
>>> >> So, which one should I work on?
>>> >>
>>> >> brian.mgz or brainmask.mgz?
>>> >>
>>> >> Also, for defects on the white matter surface (the yellow one),  I
>>> found the
>>> >> surface doesn't follow the white matter segmentation closely,
>>> although
>>> I
>>> >> have a good wm.mgz. (see attached image).
>>> >> At the location pointed by the red arrow in the attached image, both
>>> the
>>> >> green and yellow sufaces includes a lot of gray matter at the
>>> location.
>>> It
>>> >> is strange that the wm.mgz has a very well defined slice in that
>>> >> neighborhood.
>>> >> I am familiar with situations where the surfaces miss a few white
>>> matter
>>> >> pixels, for which I can add a few control points to improve it.
>>> >>
>>> >> How shall I edit wm.mgz to correct this?  Adding more control points
>>> is
>>> not
>>> >> a solution, apparently.
>>> >>
>>> >> Thank you.
>>> >>
>>> >> Yang
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to
>>> whom
>>> it is
>>> >> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and
>>> the
>>> e-mail
>>> >> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
>>> HelpLine at
>>> >> <http://www.partners.org/complianceline>
>>> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
>>> in
>>> error
>>> >> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender
>>> and
>>> properly
>>> >> dispose of the e-mail.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> <wrong_surfs_c39.jpg>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> Freesurfer mailing list
>>> >> <[email protected]>[email protected]
>>> >> <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer>
>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Freesurfer mailing list
>>> > <[email protected]>[email protected]
>>> > <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer>
>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to
>>> whom
>>> it is
>>> > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and
>>> the
>>> e-mail
>>> > contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
>>> HelpLine at
>>> > <http://www.partners.org/complianceline>
>>> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
>>> in
>>> error
>>> > but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender
>>> and
>>> properly
>>> > dispose of the e-mail.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sebastian Moeller
>>>
>>> telephone: 626-807-5242 / 626-395-6523 / 626-395-6616
>>> fax: 626-395-8826
>>> German GSM:  0 15 77 - 1 90 31 41
>>> US CDMA: + 1 - 626 - 807 - 5242
>>>  <[email protected]>[email protected]
>>>
>>> Division of Biology
>>> MC 114-96
>>> California Institute of Technology
>>> 1200 East California Boulevard
>>> CA 91125, Pasadena
>>> USA
>>>
>>>
>>
>

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to