as improvements are made to the freesurfer algorithms, there will be
differences in results between versions (and between platforms and OSs).
so you should be ok with choosing v4.5 for your results.

do not mix results from different versions though!

n.



On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 22:34 +0200, Rune Thormodsen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> We are concerned about differences of cortical thickness when we
> process the
> 
> same scans in freesurfer 4.5 and 3.02. We have attached an excel
> spreadsheet
> 
> of the differences in thickness between 4.5 and 3.02 using the mean
> 
> thickness of parcellations of both versions in both hemispheres. The
> 
> difference in the paracellations vary from 3-11% between the versions.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Are these findings reliable and explainable in choosing freesurfer 4.5
> as
> 
> our final version.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Any comment are greatly appreciated,
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks!
> 
>  
> 
> Rune
> 
>  
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to