Hi Bruce, Thanks for responding. We do have T2, but not PD. Of course the resolution of the T2 is much lower (5mm slices). -roddy
-----Original Message----- From: Bruce Fischl [mailto:fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 7:54 AM To: Roderick McColl; Matti Hamalainen Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_watershed for inner_skull_surface question Matti Hamalainen (ccd) might have some thoughts. Do you have T2 or PD images? cheers Bruce On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Roderick McColl wrote: > Hi all, > > Trying to get mri_watershed to give me a good inner_skull_surface, > which I want to combine with the pial surface to estimate sulcal CSF, > as I don't see any other way. Unfortunately the data I have tested on > all generate unreliable inner_skull surfaces. Can anyone provide a tip for > optimizing the result? > > Thanks > > -roddy > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > ______________________________________________________________________ > ___________ > > UT Southwestern Medical Center > The future of medicine, today. > > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
