I just took a look at it, and I think it's still running. How long has it 
been? There looks like there is a very large topological defect, that will 
take a long time to correct. The correction has complexity that is 
quadratic in the convex hull of the largest defect, so large ones can take 
a *long* time. Usually when there is one this big though it means something 
failed. Check the rh.inflated.nofix and rh.orig.nofix files to see if there 
is a connection to the skull or something else. If you have trouble fixing 
this, upload the subject and we'll take a look.

cheers
Bruce

On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, Kenichiro Tanaka wrote:

> Dear Bruce,
>
> I emailed you the recon-all.log.
> Please check it and tell me how wrong something is?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kenichiro Tanaka.
>
> (2011/10/19 21:26), Bruce Fischl wrote:
>>  ok, why don't you tar and gzip the subject and put it on our ftp site. You
>>  can also just email me the recon-all.log and I'll take a look
>>  Bruce
>>  On Wed, 19 Oct 2011, Kenichiro Tanaka wrote:
>> 
>> >  Dear Bruce,
>> > 
>> >  I think they are error.
>> >  The number of output files is not complete.
>> >  For example, there are only lh.aparc.a2009s.stats, lh.aparc.stats and
>> >  lh.curv.stats on stats directory.
>> > 
>> >  Thanks,
>> > 
>> >  Kenichiro Tanaka.
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> >  (2011/10/18 21:30), Bruce Fischl wrote:
>> >        Are you sure they are errors? We see this mysterious message
>> >        sometimes, but I don't think it is really an error, and usually
>> >        things are fine
>> > 
>> >        cheers
>> >        Bruce
>> > 
>> >        On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Kenichiro Tanaka wrote:
>> > 
>> >              Hello All,
>> > 
>> >              While processing a brain image data(.mgz) through
>> >              ver5.0.0, I got the
>> >              following errors.
>> >              I have no idea how to resolve them.
>> >              I need outputs in stats directory, there are only
>> >              lh.aparc.a2009s.stats,
>> >              lh.aparc.stats, and lh.curv.stats.
>> >              What caused them?
>> >              How should I resolve them?
>> > 
>> >              IFLAG= -1 LINE SEARCH FAILED. SEE DOCUMENTATION OF
>> >              ROUTINE MCSRCH ERROR
>> >              RETURN OF LINE SEARCH: INFO= 3 POSSIBLE CAUSES:
>> >              FUNCTION OR GRADIENT ARE
>> >              INCORRECT OR INCORRECT TOLERANCESoutof
>> >              QuasiNewtonEMA: 005: -log(p) =
>> >              10318.1 tol 0.000010
>> >              .
>> >              .
>> >              .
>> >              inflating to sphere (rms error < 2.00)
>> >              000: dt: 0.0000, rms radial error=175.699, avgs=0
>> >              005/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=175.446,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              010/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=174.904,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              015/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=174.193,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              020/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=173.383,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              025/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=172.518,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              030/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=171.620,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              035/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=170.706,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              040/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=169.784,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              045/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=168.860,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              050/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=167.935,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              055/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=167.012,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              060/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=166.092,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              065/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=165.175,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              070/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=164.262,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              075/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=163.352,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              080/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=162.447,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              085/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=161.547,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              090/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=160.651,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              095/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=159.759,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              100/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=158.871,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              105/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=157.989,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              110/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=157.110,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              115/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=156.236,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              120/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=155.367,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              125/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=154.502,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              130/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=153.642,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              135/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=152.786,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              140/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=151.934,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              145/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=151.087,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              150/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=150.245,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              155/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=149.407,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              160/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=148.573,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              165/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=147.744,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              170/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=146.919,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              175/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=146.098,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              180/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=145.282,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              185/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=144.470,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              190/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=143.663,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              195/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=142.860,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              200/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=142.061,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              205/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=141.266,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              210/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=140.476,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              215/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=139.693,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              220/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=138.914,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              225/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=138.140,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              230/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=137.370,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              235/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=136.604,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              240/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=135.842,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              245/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=135.085,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              250/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=134.332,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              255/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=133.583,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              260/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=132.838,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              265/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=132.098,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              270/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=131.362,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              275/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=130.629,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              280/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=129.901,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              285/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=129.177,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              290/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=128.456,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              295/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=127.740,
>> >              avgs=0
>> >              300/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=127.028,
>> >              avgs=0
>> > 
>> >              spherical inflation complete.
>> >              .
>> >              .
>> >              .
>> >              epoch 4 (K=1280.0), pass 1, starting sse = 541.21
>> >              taking momentum steps...
>> >              taking momentum steps...
>> >              taking momentum steps...
>> >              pass 1 complete, delta sse/iter = 0.32/19 = 0.01710
>> >              finalwriting spherical brain to
>> >              ../surf/lh.qsphere.nofix
>> >              spherical transformation took 0.10 hours
>> >              distance error %100000.00
>> >              .
>> >              .
>> >              .
>> >              pass 1: epoch 1 of 3 starting distance error %21.36
>> >              pass 1: epoch 2 of 3 starting distance error %21.04
>> >              unfolding complete - removing small folds...
>> >              starting distance error %20.80
>> >              removing remaining folds...
>> >              final distance error %20.81
>> >              364: 0 negative triangles
>> >              .
>> >              .
>> >              .
>> > 
>> > 
>> >              Thanks,
>> > 
>> >              Kenichiro Tanaka.
>> > 
>> >              _______________________________________________
>> >              Freesurfer mailing list
>> >              [email protected]
>> >              https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> >        The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person
>> >        to whom it is
>> >        addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error
>> >        and the e-mail
>> >        contains patient information, please contact the Partners
>> >        Compliance HelpLine at
>> >        http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent
>> >        to you in error
>> >        but does not contain patient information, please contact the
>> >        sender and properly
>> >        dispose of the e-mail.
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> 
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to