Hi Lindsay they are both biologically relevant measures, it's just a question of what you are investigating. If you are doing volume it's probably worth decommposing it into surface area and thickness though to understand the underlying neurobiology better Bruce
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Lindsay Ercole wrote: > What is the current opinion on using cortical volumes rather than reporting > on thickness? > > Sincerest thanks, > Lindsay > > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
